CONDANNA INGIUSTA
CONFERMATA IN APPELLO UNA CONDANNA INGIUSTA
Il
12 aprile si è tenuto a Phnom Penh il processo di appello a carico di
due persone, Born Samnang e Sok Sam Oeun, accusate dell’assassinio di
Chea Vichea, presidente del Sindacato libero dei lavoratori del regno
di Cambogia (FTUWKC), avvenuto il 22 gennaio 2004 (vedi Newsletter n.
3/2007). La sentenza ha confermato la condanna a vent’anni di carcere
per entrambi. Il FTUWKC, le organizzazioni internazionali per i diritti
umani, fra cui Amnesty international, il rappresentante per i diritti
umani dell’ONU in Cambogia hanno fin dall’inizio sollevato seri dubbi
sui risultati dell’indagine condotta dalla polizia e sulle procedure
processuali che hanno determinato la condanna in primo grado. Oltre a
molte altre irregolarità, i testimoni oculari chiave non sono stati
ascoltati e in seguito hanno ricevuto minacce di morte.
Secondo l’Asian human rights commission (AHRC), che ha seguito fin dall’inizio il caso, è chiaro il tentativo del governo di coprire un delitto politico individuando due opportuni capri espiatori. Il 18 aprile scorso, l’OIL ha stigmatizzato in una dichiarazione ufficiale gli esiti del processo di appello rivolgendo nuovamente al governo cambogiano l’invito a svolgere una nuova indagine, seria e imparziale, sull’assassinio di Chea Vichea.
INVIATE UNA LETTERA AL GOVERNO CAMBOGIANO (fate copia e incolla del testo che trovate di seguito)
Mr. Samdech Hun Sen
Prime Minister
E-mail: cabinet1b@camnet.com.kh
Mr. Sar Kheng
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior
E-Mail: info@interior.gov.kh or moi@interior.gov.kh
CAMBODIA: Unjust conviction of two men by the appeal court in the murder of Chea Vichea
I strongly condemn an unjust and politically biased conviction of Born
Samnang and Sok Samoeun in the murder of a prominent union leader Chea
Vichea by the Court of Appeals on 12 April 2007. I am informed that the
Court of Appeals upheld the Municipal court's verdict in August 2005,
in which that the two accused had been sentenced 20 years imprisonment.
However, I do not think the hearings of the appeal court were just and
fair. The final hearing was conducted in an absentia of the two
defendants and their defence lawyers. It is such a wrong procedure that
the appeal should not decide in absentia without the present of the
defendants, the defendants' lawyer because the defendants have also
their rights to listen to the verdict announce.
I am also informed that during the hearings, the appeals court rejected
all of the defend witnesses and did not bring the prosecution witnesses
for the hearing at all. The appeal court also rejected prosecutor's
request on April 6 for re-investigation to find real murderer. I am
informed that the judge had always accepted the prosecution witnesses'
testimony that they did not even join the appeal hearing. I suspect
that there could be a political motivation behind the appeal verdict.
During the appeal hearing on 6 April 2007, Bon Samnang raised a lot
about the torture in the police station that the police had tortured
him to confess. However, all these matters were simply ignored. The
appeal judge did not also accept Ms. Va Sothy's statement issued on 10
August
2006 from Thailand who is the eyes-witness at the sense and who see the
perpetrators very clearly because Ms. Va Sothy haven't vow before the
court.
There are many other irregularities in the appeal hearings.
On top of that, I think the final appeal court hearing on 12 April 2007
seemed so ridiculous because it was too rush that the judge started the
hearing at 7: 20 am which is wrong this his schedule that suppose to
started at 7: 30am so that it could less interested and participated
from the international observer or media or the defend lawyers. I also
think that the court had deliberately chose 12 April for its verdict to
minimise when Cambodians are busy celebrating their new year.
From the begging since the murder of Chea Vichea, criminal
investigation and trial was deeply flawed relating to murder of Chea
Vichea and I believe that the true perpetrators responsible for the
murder of Chea Vichea have not been held to account. Born Samnang and
Sok Sam Oeun had alibis for the time of the shooting, but those
providing the alibis were threatened and detained by police, while
other witnesses were also intimidated by the police.
Now Born Samnang and Sok Sam Oeun will be held in prison for 20 years
for the crime these two men in all probability have not committed. In
all probability too this is a huge miscarriage of justice.
I therefore strongly urge the Cambodian authorities as well as
international commnity to immediately intervene into this matter to
bring independent and effective re-investigation into the murder of
Chea Vichea so that the real murderers are brought to justice. Born
Samnang and Sok Sam Oeun should be given a chance for re-trial and
released without delay, unless there is sufficient evidence to bring
charges against them.
Yours truly,